President Bush Drinking Again

MMM | September 24, 2005 – 3:44 pm |

Faced with the biggest crisis of his political life, President Bush has hit the bottle again, The National Enquirer reveals.

Bush, who said he quit drinking the morning after his 40th birthday, has started boozing amid the Katrina catastrophe.

Bush is under the worst pressure of his two terms in office and his popularity is near an all-time low. The handling of the Katrina crisis and troop losses in Iraq have fueled public discontent and pushed Bush back to drink.

A Washington source said: “The sad fact is that he has been sneaking drinks for weeks now. Laura may have only just caught him

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google
  1. 8 Responses to “President Bush Drinking Again”

  2. n i T'works on Sep 24, 2005 | Reply

    President Bush Drinking Again

    National Enquirer has a story out about the reason why President Bush took so much time off at his ranch. Like the movie Paparazzi, they make up stories to make people look bad. How do I know the story is made up? I don’t know. But it doesn̵…

  3. MultiMediaStory.com on Sep 24, 2005 | Reply

    Bush Drinking and Still a Failure as Rita pounds Texas

    Amid rumours that Bush is drinking again (Technorati: “Bush drinking”), back on the bottle as he sloshes his way through the political pressure of Katrina’s broken levees, reports are emerging from the search engine world that Bush is still a failure o…

  4. Jenn on Sep 26, 2005 | Reply

    Boo… Since when did you start posting quotes from The National Enquirer? I’m still waiting for the aliens they promised that were going to invade planet Earth. But I guess only time can tell on that one. :-P

  5. MMM on Sep 26, 2005 | Reply

    loool…
    Oh well, everyone was posting about it, so I thought I would too :P
    And hey didn’t you hear that those Aliens did come? But they found the world was already screwed up enough as it is, so they decided against invading it and left :P

  6. Cathy on Sep 27, 2005 | Reply

    Jenn: It was the National Enquirer that first reported the Clinton/Monica story. I heard one of the Enquirer’s editors on the Ed Shultz Show and the Nancy Skinner Show say they have 2 White House sources and do not want to get sued.

    FYI: Also more people in the Red states read the National Enquirer than do in the Blue states.

  7. Jenn on Sep 27, 2005 | Reply

    Doesn’t matter. With absurd stories like aliens, apocalypses, and half squirrel half human babies, getting the story right a few times proves nothing to me.

    I don’t see the connection with this and the Red States reading it more than Blue states. Other than it’s sad and you can see the kind of crap people from the Red states is reading. :-P

  8. wake up folks on Oct 18, 2005 | Reply

    the Enquirer pays HUGE money to get info from which to report almost-always accurate, usually gossip-type, sleazy news. They are not like the other bizarre tabloids, and have tons of legitimate stuff not much covered by mainstream dailies. Some of their headline lead-ins are what is more inaccurate to boost sales but… I’ve seen plenty of stuff verified much later by other more “respected” newspapers.

  9. Helen Breen on Oct 31, 2005 | Reply

    NY Times Magazine, Sunday, Oct. 30, 2005.
    Interview with Bush chef Ariel de Guzman, a Q & A about cooking for Bush 41 and 43.

    After being asked about concerns of being poisoned when President travels abroad, he was asked a last question:

    Q. What about his drinks?

    A. “When he asks for a vodka on the rocks, it’s our guys (Navy cooks) who mix it from our own supply that we have to bring all the way around the world with us. Nobody knows that.”

    P. 19 Check it out!

Post a Comment

Subzero Blue is the personal weblog of Mohamed Marwen Meddah, an IT manager, amateur photographer and web enthusiast from Tunisia. This site is updated frequently with a variety of topics that I find interesting, from all over the world... Read More »